NBK Wealth Thought Leadership: Private Markets for Individual Investors Opportunities and Risks
Background
For decades, private markets were primarily accessible to institutional investors and ultra-high-net-worth individuals (UHNWIs). Pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and endowments traditionally led allocations to private equity, private credit and infrastructure, given their ability to withstand long lockup periods and manage capital calls effectively.
That landscape is now changing. The rise of semi-liquid private market funds over the past decade has democratized access to private assets, catering to growing demand from high-net-worth and mass-affluent investors in a way that is more accessible than traditional private markets funds. These funds offer a more flexible and accessible entry point into private markets, balancing liquidity needs with the potential for diversification and yield without the constraints of traditional private market structures.
Semi-Liquid Private Markets Funds – Definition
Semi-liquid funds provide exposure to illiquid private market assets while offering limited but periodic liquidity, typically allowing redemptions of up to 5% of the fund’s net asset value per quarter.
These funds are often described as “evergreen” funds because they do not have a fixed end date. This contrasts with traditional private market funds, which typically operate on 10-15-year cycles, including multi-year investment periods and eventual wind-downs when capital is returned to investors.
Key Feature of semi-liquid structures:
· Investors can subscribe at any time
· Capital is deployed immediately upon investment
· Distributions are automatically reinvested, unless otherwise specified
· Investors may request redemptions periodically, subject to predefined limits
In summary, semi-liquid funds bridge the gap between the long-term economic benefits of private markets and the operational flexibility of liquid investment vehicles, offering a more accessible entry point for a broader range of investors.
Growth of Semi-Liquid Funds
Semi-liquid private market funds, often structured as evergreen vehicles, have seen rapid growth, particularly within the private wealth segment. By the end of 2024, these funds managed an estimated $2.7 trillion in assets with projections suggesting growth to $4.4 trillion by 2029[1]. The evergreen structure allows high-net-worth investors to access private market strategies at a scale and structure previously available only to institutions.
This expansion reflects a broader structural shift. Institutional investors have long allocated 20-40% of their portfolios to private markets, while individual investors have historically had limited access. As wealth managers increasingly prioritize diversification and seek new return drivers, semi-liquid, evergreen funds have become a key access point, bridging the gap between traditional private market lockups and the liquidity needs of private investors.
Why Semi-Liquid Funds Appeal to High-Net-Worth Investors
1. Operational Simplicity and No Capital Calls
Traditional private market funds require investors to commit capital upfront, with gradual funding through capital calls over several years. This approach can complicate liquidity planning and requires ongoing monitoring. Semi-liquid funds streamline this process: investors subscribe once and fund their investments immediately. This eliminates the need for ongoing cash-flow management and simplifies administration, a major advantage for wealth clients and advisors.
2. Immediate Deployment and Mitigated J-Curve Effect
Traditional private funds often experience early negative or muted returns as capital is deployed gradually, while management fees accrue. In contrast, semi-liquid funds typically deploy new capital directly into an existing, diversified portfolio. This immediate deployment helps smooth early performance and reduces the impact of the J-curve, providing more predictable returns from the outset.
3. Built-in Compounding and Perpetual Structure
Traditional private funds distribute proceeds as investments mature. Investors must then find new opportunities, creating reinvestment risk. Semi-liquid funds typically reinvest investment proceeds automatically. Over time, this continuous compounding can significantly enhance long-term returns and simplify portfolio management. For investors focused on wealth accumulation, this perpetual structure can be particularly attractive.
4. Periodic Liquidity with Structure Flexibility
While private markets are inherently illiquid, semi-liquid funds introduce conditional redemption mechanisms. Most funds allow quarterly redemption requests, typically capped at 5% of net asset value per quarter. Although not as liquid as public markets, this structure provides more flexibility than traditional private funds, where capital may be locked in for a decade or longer. For wealth planning, this limited liquidity can support cash-flow needs, portfolio rebalancing and life-event planning. While the redemption windows provide flexibility, they are limited and conditional, which should be considered when integrating semi-liquid funds into a portfolio.
Portfolio Integration & Allocation
Traditional private market funds typically require minimum commitments of $1-5 million or more, a threshold that has historically limited participation to ultra-high-net-worth individuals and institutional investors. These high entry points have also constrained wealth clients’ ability to diversify across strategies, managers and vintage years. Semi-liquid funds materially lower this barrier, with minimum investments often in the $10,000-$50,000 range. While this lowers the barrier to accessing private markets, the more meaningful implication is how it reshapes portfolio construction. Lower minimums allow advisors and investors to:
- Diversify across multiple private market strategies (private equity, private credit and real assets).
- Allocate across several managers to reduce performance dispersion.
- Phase allocations over time to manage vintage-year exposure.
- Integrate private markets into core model portfolios rather than treating them as standalone satellite investments.
For wealth managers, this scalability allows for consistent implementation across client segments. For investors, it shifts private markets from periodic commitments to strategic programmatic allocations within a diversified portfolio. When thoughtfully integrated, semi-liquid private markets can serve distinct roles within a diversified portfolio:
- Private credit enhances income generation.
- Private Equity offers access to operational value creation and differentiated return drivers compared to public equities, along with diversification benefits relative to concentrated public market exposures.
- Core Infrastructure delivers stable cash flows with partial inflation protection.
Allocation sizing must account for liquidity constraints. Semi-liquid funds are best suited for investors with a multi-year time horizon and should be considered part of a portfolio’s “illiquidity bucket”. They are complements to public markets, not substitutes.
Key Risks and Considerations
While semi-liquid funds offer meaningful advantages, investors must carefully weigh the risks and trade-offs. These structures are not substitutes for liquid public market funds.
1. Liquidity Mismatch
Semi-liquid funds invest in inherently illiquid assets but offer periodic redemption features. This creates a structural liquidity mismatch, and the liquidity provided to investors should be viewed as conditional, not guaranteed. During periods of market stress, redemption requests may exceed fund limits, triggering redemption gates or suspensions. As a result, investors may not always receive full or timely liquidity when requested.
2. Valuation Subjectivity
Private assets are not traded on public exchanges and therefore valuations rely on models, periodic appraisals and comparable transactions. This introduces subjectivity and reporting lags compared to public markets.
As a result, reported volatility for private market funds often appears lower than for public market equivalents. However, this smoothing effect reflects valuation methodology rather than lower underlying economic risk. During periods of market stress, private asset values may adjust more gradually, but their sensitivity to growth, credit conditions and financing markets remains. Investors should not mistake this apparent stability for an absence of risk.
3. Manager Selection
Unlike public markets, where performance dispersion among managers is often limited, private markets exhibit a wide range of performance outcomes. Manager selection is therefore critical, as the gap between top- and bottom-performing managers can be substantial. Access to and the ability to identify high-quality managers with rigorous investment processes is key for successful private market investing.
Key Takeaways
- Semi-liquid funds represent a significant evolution in providing individual investors with access to private markets.
- They simplify participation by removing capital calls, offering periodic liquidity and lowering minimum investment thresholds.
- Investors must fully understand liquidity constraints and valuation subjectivity inherent in these structures.
- Manager selection is critical due to the wide dispersion in performance.
- ·Semi-liquid funds complement, rather than replace, public market allocations, offering a more accessible alternative to institutional private market investments. They effectively bridge the gap between institutional private markets and individual wealth portfolios.
When used thoughtfully, private markets can play a valuable role in long-term wealth building, but they require education, discipline, and realistic expectations.
[1] Source: Pitchbook research report
Download news clippings here
